P.

P. v. Velasquez CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 2, 2013F064285California797 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

On December 2, 2011, a jury found Daniel Velasquez (appellant) guilty of carjacking (Pen. Code, § 215, subd. (a), count 1)1 and robbery (§§ 211 & 212.5, subd. (c), count 2). In a bifurcated proceeding, the trial court found true allegations that appellant had a prior conviction within the meaning of the three strikes law (§§ 667, subds. (c)-(j) & 1170.12, subds. (a)-(e)) and a prior serious felony enhancement (§ 667, subd. (a)). The court also found true six prior prison term enhancements (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). On January 6, 2012, the trial court sentenced appellant to the midterm of five years on count 1, doubled the sentence to 10 years pursuant to the three strikes law, and stayed appellant’s sentence on count 2 pursuant to section 654. The court imposed sentence on five of the prior prison term enhancements and imposed a term of five years for the prior serious felony enhancement.2 Appellant’s total prison term is 20 years. The court granted total custody credits of 204 days, imposed a $200 restitution fine, a $10 crime prevention fine pursuant to section 1202.5, and other fines and fees. Appellant contends that there is an error in the abstract of judgment, a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.