Lee v. Stearn CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 2, 2013B244790California1,734 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/2/13 Lee v. Stearn CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

KYUNG RYUN LEE, B244790

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC460556) v.

MARTIN STEARN et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Deirdre Hill, Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of Andrew Kim and Andrew Kim for Plaintiff and Appellant. No appearance for Defendants and Respondents.

__________________________________ Kyung Ryun Lee appeals from a judgment against her after a court trial of her legal malpractice action against Martin Stearn and others. She claims the trial court erred in denying her a continuance for proper preparation for trial, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.