Peterson

Truconnect Communications, Inc. v. Peterson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202524-3297California700 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 25 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TRUCONNECT COMMUNICATIONS, No. 24-3297 INC., a California corporation, D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-01933-AB-AS

v. MEMORANDUM*

RACHEL PETERSON, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California and in her individual capacity,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California André Birotte Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, IKUTA, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). TruConnect Communications, Inc., appeals the district court’s order granting

Rachel Peterson’s motion to dismiss its operative Second Amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.