Grigorescu
Grigorescu v. Whitlock
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202524-547California828 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
VIOLETA GRIGORESCU, No. 24-547 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:18-cv-05932-EMC v.
MEMORANDUM*
EUGENE WHITLOCK,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SAN
MATEO COUNTY COMMUNITY
COLLEGE DISTRICT, HARRY
JOEL, CHARLENE FRONTIERA,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 5, 2025 San Francisco, California
Before: WARDLAW, BEA, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Appellant Eugene Whitlock appeals the district court’s summary judgment
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. order denying him qualified immunity on Appellee Violeta Grigorescu’s First
Amendment retaliation claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 Grigorescu alleges
that Whitlock initiated a retaliatory investigation into her educational credentials
and engaged in a campaign of…