People v. Castro CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 25, 2025E084258California617 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

Defendant and his cousin, Salvador Mendoza, were together in a car when they

began following another car containing four men. Defendant was driving. After

defendant and Mendoza followed the other car for several miles, Mendoza began

shooting at the men, injuring two of them.

In 1995, a jury found defendant guilty of four counts of attempted murder with

firearm enhancements (§§ 664, 187, & former § 12022, subd. (d)) and one count of

conspiracy to commit murder (§§ 182, 187). The trial court struck the enhancements and

sentenced defendant to indeterminate consecutive life sentences on each of the four

attempted murder convictions and, as to the conspiracy count, 25 years to life to run

consecutive to the sentences imposed on the attempted murder counts.

On January 1, 2019, Senate Bill No. 1437 became effective. (Stats. 2018,

ch. 1015.) That measure amended sections 188 (defining malice) and 189 (defining

degrees of murder) to limit the reach of the felony murder rule and the natural and

probable consequences doctrine as it relates to murder. (Stats. 2018, ch. 1015, §§ 2, 3.)

The bill did not mention laws concerning attempted murder.

Section 1170.95…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.