Harvey

Harvey v. Rebennack CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 25, 2025A170441California5,166 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 3/25/25 Harvey v. Rebennack CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

JAMES TED HARVEY,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A170441

v. ANDREW REBENNACK et al., (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC23610011) Defendants and Appellants.

After his residential tenancy was terminated by means of an owner move-in eviction, James Ted Harvey sued Andrew Rebennack, Kathy Maionchi, Daniel Maionchi, Clark Maionchi, and Dominic Maionchi (defendants) alleging five causes of action including violations of the San Francisco Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance (Rent Ordinance). Defendants filed a motion to strike four of the causes of action under the anti- SLAPP statute (Code Civ. Proc, § 425.16).1 The trial court denied defendants’ motion at the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.