Herrick

United States v. Herrick

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 202524-1753California612 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1753 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:18-cr-00084-WHO-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ADAM HERRICK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Horsley Orrick, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 3, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Adam Herrick appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Herrick’s

motion for compassionate release. The district court acknowledged the Bureau of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Prisons’ (“BOP”) delay in diagnosing and treating Herrick’s prostate cancer but

found that he failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.