United States v. Arturo Balbueno-Castillo

Good Law
536 F. App'x 693
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 2, 201312-10491California272 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 02 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10491

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:11-cr-02344-JGZ

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ARTURO BALBUENO-CASTILLO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 24, 2013 **

Before: ALARCÓN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Arturo Balbueno-Castillo appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 33-month sentence for reentry after

deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), Balbueno-Castillo’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). no grounds for relief, along with a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.