Ballesteros
Ballesteros v. Ford Motor Co.
Opinion
Opinion
Chou, J.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A. Ballesteros’s Contract with Fairview Ballesteros purchased a new 2017 Ford Explorer Sport (Explorer) at Fairview in August 2018. He signed a pre-printed form entitled “RETAIL
INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT – SIMPLE FINANCE CHARGE (WITH
ARBITRATION PROVISION)” (Contract). Under the terms of the Contract, he agreed to buy the Explorer on credit rather than for cash. In doing so, he agreed to pay Fairview the amount he was financing plus a finance charge. The Contract identified the Explorer that Ballesteros purchased. It set forth federal truth-in-lending disclosures, including the amount financed, the annual percentage rate, and the total sale price. It noted that Ballesteros was trading-in a car to reduce the amount he owed for the Explorer. It identified optional service contracts, without detailing the terms of those agreements. The Contract was only between Ballesteros, identified as the “Buyer” and “You,” and Fairview, identified as the “Seller-Creditor,” “we,” and “us.” There were no other parties or signatories to the Contract. The first page of the Contract included an “Agreement to Arbitrate,” which stated that “you [Ballesteros] or we…