National Account Management Inc. v. Shelly Singhal

Good Law
536 F. App'x 687
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 2, 201308-55647, 08-56140California443 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

National Account Management, Inc. and Business Growth Funding, Inc. (collectively National), appeal the district court’s dismissal of their First Amended Complaint on the motion of Shelley Singhal, Nicole Martin, and SBI Brightline V LLC’s (collectively Moving Parties), and the grant of summary judgment in favor of SBI-USA.

1.The judgment in this case was sufficiently final to confer jurisdiction upon this court. The district court’s order granting the Moving Parties’ motion to dismiss fully adjudicated all claims against the Moving Parties. The district court’s order granting SBI-USA’s motion for summary judgment fully adjudicated all claims against SBI-USA. The parties proceeded as though final judgment was entered, and National filed a timely appeal. Because the district court’s order evidenced intent to finalize the case, (dismissal with prejudice); (granting summary judgment motion in its entirety) and the parties proceeded as if final judgment was entered, we have jurisdiction. See Long v. Cnty. of L.A., 442 F.3d 1178 , 1184 n. 3 (9th Cir.2006).

2. In two separate orders, the district court directed National to serve its complaint on the Moving Parties. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.