Robles

(PC) Hicks v. Robles

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20251:18-cv-01481California1,328 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHAEL JAMES HICKS, No. 1:18-cv-01481-KES-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION TO

WITHDRAW FROM HIS SETTLEMENT

H. ROBLES, et al., AGREEMENT Defendants. Docs. 139, 146, 155, 161 16 17 18 Plaintiff Michael James Hicks is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this closed civil rights case that was brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 27, 2024, plaintiff filed a second motion to withdraw from the settlement agreement. Doc. 139. He filed an amended request for the same relief with additional arguments on October 18, 2024, and an additional memorandum on December 9, 2024. Docs. 146, 155. Plaintiff generally argues that defendants failed to comply with the terms of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.