German Coreas v. Miller

Good Law
536 F. App'x 708
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 2, 201312-17538California234 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

California state prisoner German Coreas appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Coreas failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether a one-day delay in changing Coreas’s bandages following knee surgery caused him to contract cellulitis or to suffer further injury and undue pain. See Jett v. Penner, 439 F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th Cir.2006) (setting forth standard for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, and explaining that a prisoner must show harm “caused by” the indifference to establish deliberate indifference); Toguchi, 391 F.3d at 1057-58 (neither negligence nor prisoner’s difference of opinion with prison medical authorities is sufficient to state a deliberate indifference claim); Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 746 (9th Cir.2002) (prisoner alleging deliberate indifference based on delay in treatment must show that delay led to further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.