Kullab

Kullab v. United States Department of Homeland Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20253:24-cv-04140California5,643 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 YASMIN KULLAB, Case No. 24-cv-04140-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF Re: Dkt. No. 13 HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Yasmin Kullab (“Kullab”) filed an asylum application with the United States Department of Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) on November 3, 2020. To date, Kullab’s application has not been adjudicated, and she has not yet been contacted for her asylum interview. Kullab filed this action against USCIS, the United States Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), and three individuals—Alejandro Mayorkas (“Mayorkas”), Ur M. Jaddou (“Jaddou”), and Emelia Bardini (“Bardini)—in their official capacities (together “defendants”). Under both the Mandamus Act (“Mandamus”) and the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), Kullab claims that the adjudication of her application has been unreasonably delayed and requests an order compelling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.