Jordan

Jordan v. Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20253:24-cv-07232California634 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASSMERE JORDAN, Case No. 24-cv-07232-VC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING RULE 60(B)

v. MOTION TO REOPEN CASE

KIMPTON HOTEL & RESTAURANT Re: Dkt. No.

GROUP, LLC,

Defendant.

The Court dismissed Jordan’s complaint with leave to amend on January 13, 2025, and gave her 21 days to file an amended complaint. After that time passed without an amended complaint, a judgment dismissing the case with prejudice was entered on February 5. Plaintiff’s counsel has now filed a motion to reopen this case under Rule 60(b). He says that he accidentally deleted the email containing the order dismissing the case while attempting to calendar a different notification that was also issued on the same day in this case. After the judgment was filed, he emailed defense counsel about meeting and conferring on filing a Rule 60(b) motion, and, after defense counsel said that a meet-and-confer on this issue was not necessary, filed the present motion on February 14. Under Rule 60(b), this Court can “may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding” on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.