Tapia
(PC) Solomon v. Tapia
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KING SOLOMON, Case No. 1:22-cv-1604-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION
v. (Doc. No. 47) TAPIA,
Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration filed on February 3, 2025. (Doc. No. 47). Plaintiff asks the Court to reconsider its January 21, 2025 Order striking Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery. (See generally Id.). Because Plaintiff filed the motion within 28 days of the order being challenged, the Court construes the Motion as made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the Motion. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) permits a party to move a court to alter or amend its judgment. “A district court may grant a Rule 59(e) motion if it ‘is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error, or if there is an intervening change in the…