Xiong
Xiong v. Garland
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAICHUN XIONG, Case No. 1:24-cv-00802-KES-CDB
Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING
v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
MERRICK B. GARLAND, et al., AND OBEY A COURT ORDER
Defendants. Doc. 18 16 On July 10, 2024, plaintiff Kaichun Xiong, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action with the filing of a complaint for writ of mandamus against defendants Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, and Ur. M. Jaddou. Docs. 1, 3. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 19, 2024, defendants filed the pending motion to dismiss and served the motion on plaintiff. Doc. 13. Plaintiff failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition as required by Local Rule 230(c) (see Docket), and on January 14, 2025, defendants replied in support of the…