Dunn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EMMA DUNN, et al., No. 1:24-cv-00815-KES-BAM Plaintiffs, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

v. PENDING REQUESTS TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

HUD URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al., (Docs. 2, 5, 8, 9) Defendants.

16 On October 18, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations that the pending requests to proceed in forma pauperis in this multi-plaintiff action be denied because the $405.00 filing fee was paid. Doc. 9. The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiffs Emma Dunn and Alana Dunn and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. Id. at 3. Plaintiffs filed objections on October 29, 2024. Doc. 10. Plaintiffs’ objections do not challenge the recommendation that their requests to proceed in forma pauperis be denied given that the filing fee was paid. Id. Among other things, the objections…