Doerer
(PC) Simpson v. Doerer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MERL SIMPSON, No. 1:24-cv-01528-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE J. DOERER, et al., (Doc. 8) Defendants. 16 17 18 On December 13, 2024, plaintiff filed this civil rights complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 18, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge ordered plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Doc. 5. Plaintiff failed to respond to the order to show cause. Thereafter, on January 21, 2025, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his…