Yang

Yang v. County of Siskiyou

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20252:24-cv-00251California703 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HER SENG YANG, No. 2:24-cv-00251-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION DUE TO

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY COURT

COUNTY OF SISKIYOU, et al., ORDERS AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendant. 16 On March 7, 2025, the court issued an order directing plaintiff to show cause, no later than March 21, 2025, “why this action should not be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute.” (Doc. No. 23 at 4.) Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to that order has now passed, and plaintiff has not filed a response or otherwise communicated with the court. Because “plaintiff has not participated in this action since mid-January 2024” despite “numerous outreach attempts” from plaintiff’s former counsel (Doc. No. 23 at 3), it appears that plaintiff no longer wishes to prosecute this action but rather has abandoned the litigation. /////

This order requiring plaintiff to show cause was issued only after the court granted the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.