(PS) Gilbert v. Clear Recon Corp

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20252:24-cv-02308California1,046 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL EDWARD GILBERT, No. 2:24-cv-2308-DC-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CLEAR RECON CORP, et al. Defendants. 16 On March 20, 2025, plaintiff Paul Edward Gilbert filed a motion under Rule 65(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure entitled “Ex Parte Application for Immediate Stay of Proceedings Due to Irreparable Harm.” (ECF No. 75.) The motion is appropriate for decision without oral argument under Local Rule 230(g) and should be denied. On January 17, 2025, and on March 21, 2025, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s claims in the operative first amended complaint be dismissed without further leave to amend for failure to state a claim. (ECF Nos. 57, 76.) The undersigned has also recommended plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint be denied. (ECF No. 73.) Plaintiff’s present motion for emergency relief1 seeks “an

1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.