Bondi

Meza Ramirez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 26, 202524-3150California1,025 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 26 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GABRIEL MEZA RAMIREZ, No. 24-3150 Agency No. Petitioner, A070-957-313 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 24, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: BOGGS,*** FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Gabriel Meza Ramirez, native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the denial by

an immigration judge (“IJ”) of his application for asylum, withholding of removal,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, sitting by designation. and protection under the Convention…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.