Hilliard

Hilliard v. Twin Falls County Sheriff's Office

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 26, 202524-819California662 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 26 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRENT E. HILLIARD, No. 24-819 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 1:18-cv-00550-CWD v.

MEMORANDUM*

TWIN FALLS COUNTY SHERIFF'S

OFFICE; COUNTY OF TWIN FALLS,

Defendants - Appellees.

BRENT E. HILLIARD, No. 24-2112 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 1:18-cv-00550-CWD v.

TWIN FALLS COUNTY SHERIFF'S

OFFICE; COUNTY OF TWIN FALLS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Candy W. Dale, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 24, 2025**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and KENDALL, District Judge.***

Brent Hilliard appeals from the district court’s post-judgment orders in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.