People v. Pardo CA3
Opinion
Opinion
Robie, J.
Filed 3/26/25 P. v. Pardo CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Sacramento) ----
THE PEOPLE, C098996
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 21FE015723)
v.
SUSAN PARDO,
Defendant and Appellant.
A jury found defendant Susan Pardo guilty of first degree burglary and assault with a deadly weapon. On appeal, defendant contends the trial court prejudicially violated her constitutional right against self-incrimination when it admitted into evidence her statements to police made without a prior warning under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (Miranda). Because the People demonstrate any alleged error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, we affirm.