People v. Inman CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 26, 2025C100105California3,586 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/26/25 P. v. Inman CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yuba) ----

THE PEOPLE, C100105

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CRF05- 0000177) v.

SHELDON LYNN INMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

In 2005, a jury found defendant Sheldon Lynn Inman guilty of 11 offenses and found true seven sentence enhancement allegations based on his use of a firearm to commit the offenses. The trial court sentenced Inman to an aggregate term of 54 years in prison, including a one-year sentence enhancement for having served a prior prison term. After the Legislature declared the prior prison term enhancement legally invalid (Stats. 2019, ch. 590, § 1; Stats. 2021, ch. 728, § 3), the trial court resentenced…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.