Sernoffsky

Sernoffsky v. Novak

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20253:23-cv-00039California20,373 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUSAN SERNOFFSKY, et al., Case No. 23-cv-0039-MMA-VET

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

MATT NOVAK, et al., Defendants. [Doc. No. 52] 16 17

19 Plaintiffs Susan Sernoffsky, Lauren Gaw, and Danielle Richardson (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against San Diego Police Captain Matt Novak, San Diego Police Lieutenants Rick Aguilar and Jason Scott, and Does 1 through 15. Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”). On July 12, 2024, Defendants Novak, Aguilar, and Scott (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a motion for summary judgment. Doc. No. 52. Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition, to which Defendants replied. Doc. Nos. 53, 57. The Court found the motion suitable for disposition on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Doc. No. 58. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.