Cheteni

Cheteni v. Vella

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20253:23-cv-06286California3,945 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FREEDOM CHETENI, Case No. 23-cv-06286-SI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

MALIA VELLA, et al., PLEADINGS Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

13 Plaintiff Freedom Cheteni filed a first amended complaint against defendants Malia Vella and Carrie Lopes asserting six causes of action. Dkt. No. 16. Defendants have moved for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. No. 71. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determined that the motion is suitable for resolution without oral argument, and VACATED the March 21, 2025 hearing. As detailed below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part defendants’ motion. 20 BACKGROUND Plaintiff Freedom Cheteni initially filed a petition in this Court on December 5, 2023 listing as plaintiff The VR School (which Mr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.