Ramsey

Ramsey v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20253:23-cv-01920California3,110 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 DANIEL C. RAMSEY, Case No.: 23-cv-1920-JAH-DDL

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v.

LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

JOHN DOE #1, Warden, and N. and THOMPSON, CDCR – CSR Auditor, REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION FOR

Defendants. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT 21 [Dkt. Nos. 37, 39] 23 Plaintiff Daniel C. Ramsey is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is a filing titled “Objection Motion to Defendants’ Motion for Partial Dismissal and Motion for Attorney.” Dkt. No. 39. The Court construes Plaintiff’s filing as a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, and for the appointment of counsel. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint is 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.