Harris

Harris v. Guzman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20253:24-cv-01370California460 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL JAFAIN HARRIS, Case No.: 3:24-cv-1370-TWR-DDL

CDCR # BG-5649,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION FOR (1) FAILURE TO vs. STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 14 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) AND 1915A(b),

AND (2) FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

FIDENCIO GUZMAN, G. ESCOBEDO,

16 JOHN DOE, JANE DOE, (ECF No. 5) Defendants.

19 On August 8, 2024, Plaintiff Daniel Jafain Harris, a state inmate proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, (see ECF No. 1), along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), (see ECF No. 2). The Court granted Plaintiff’s IFP request and dismissed the complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failure to state a claim. (See generally ECF No. 5 (“Order”).) In the same Order, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint and cure the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.