Foregger

Foregger v. Redfin Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20254:24-cv-05701California1,871 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHRISTINA FOREGGER, Case No. 24-cv-05701-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 8 REDFIN CORPORATION, Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Defendant Redfin Corporation’s motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 8. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). The Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND Pro se Plaintiff Cristina Foregger filed a complaint against Defendant Redfin Corporation in Alameda County Superior Court in July 2024. See Dkt. No. 1-2 (“Compl.”). The complaint lists “defamation of character” and “defrauding the court system” as Plaintiff’s causes of action. Id. at 5, § 10. Although the allegations in the complaint are difficult to follow, the Court understands Plaintiff to allege that several attorneys representing Redfin, her former employer, made false statements about her during the course of pursuing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.