VanHuissen

VanHuissen v. Warner Bros.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20255:24-cv-05788California1,079 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GREGORY SCOTT VANHUISSEN, Case No. 24-cv-05788-PCP

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

WARNER BROS., et al., Defendants.

12 Gregory Van Huisen, an inmate at the Mule Creek State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 He sues Warner Brothers, Time Warner, and Leonardo DiCaprio. The Complaint is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Mr. Van Huisen’s Complaint is dismissed with prejudice because it does not state a claim for relief. I. Background Mr. Van Huisen accuses defendants of “browbeating and splashing” him in violation of the Eighth Amendment, id. at 3; engaging in “negligence” and “theft by deception” related to “harvest time” and “dry rot,” id. at 7; and some undefined claim related to “precedence,” id. at 9. He seeks $27 million dollars for “actions that caused reckless and callous indifference to my rights motivated by evil intent civil disobedience and inchoate crime. Entrapment.” Id. at 3. II. Legal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.