McKesson Corp. v. TIN Rx The Independent Network, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MCKESSON CORPORATION, Case No. 2:24-cv-1225-DJC-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER v. TIN RX THE INDEPENDENT NETWORK, INC., et al., 15 Defendant.

17 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and Local Rule 302(c)(19). On February 11, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed…