Mimi Campbell v. Chuck Hagel

MEMORANDUM

Mimi L. Campbell appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in her employment, discrimination action alleging violations of Title VII and breach of a settlement agreement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo. Munoz v. Mabus, 630 F.3d 856, 860 (9th Cir.2010). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Campbell’s discrimination and retaliation claims arising from events occurring before October 8, 2003, because those claims are waived by the settlement agreement. See Stroman v. W. Coast Grocery Co., 884 F.2d 458, 461-63 (9th Cir.1989) (a settlement agreement may waive Title VII claims if the waiver is voluntary, deliberate, and informed).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Campbell’s discrimination claims arising from events occurring after October 8, 2003, because Campbell failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether similarly situated individuals outside her protected class were treated more favorably, or whether defendant acted with discriminatory intent. See Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, 349 F.3d 634 , 640 & n. 5 (9th…