Martinez-Santiago

Martinez-Santiago v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 202524-2546California472 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AURELIO MARTINEZ-SANTIAGO, No. 24-2546

Petitioner, Agency No.

A201-596-147

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 25, 2025** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: GRABER and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and TUNHEIM, Senior District Judge.***

Petitioner Aurelio Martinez-Santiago, a native and citizen of Mexico, timely

seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States Senior District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.