Bondi

Albarran Iturbe v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 202524-3028California848 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 27 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CLARISA ALBARRAN ITURBE; ERIK No. 24-3028 ALEJANDRO DOMINGUEZ; ERIC ISAI Agency Nos.

DOMINGUEZ, A246-761-767

A246-761-768

Petitioners,

A246-761-769

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 25, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN and OWENS, Circuit Judges, and KENDALL, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Virginia M. Kendall, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. Clarisa Albarran Iturbe; her husband, Erik Alejandro Dominguez; and their

son, Eric Isai Dominguez (collectively, “Petitioners”), natives and citizens…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.