Ross

Ross v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20253:21-cv-02130California10,404 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS ROSS, Case No.: 21CV-2130-JO-VET

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; SAN

JUDGMENT

DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

15 DEPARTMENT; et. al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff Thomas Ross1 filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that San Diego Sheriff’s Deputies used excessive force when they restrained and arrested him on December 17, 2020. Dkt. 25, Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). Defendants moved for summary judgment on the grounds that qualified immunity shields these officers’ actions. Dkt. 95-2 (“Def. Mot. Summ. J.”). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all claims.

27 Mr. Thomas Ross is now deceased, for reasons unrelated to the December 2020 incident 28 I. BACKGROUND On December 17, 2020, the San Diego Sherriff’s Department received frightened 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.