John Doe v. Regents of The University of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20253:22-cv-01506California455 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN DOE, Case No.: 22-CV-1506 JLS (VET)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) SUA SPONTE STRIKING

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS IN

LIMINE NOS. 2 & 3, AND (2) SUA

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

SPONTE MODIFYING BRIEFING

CALIFORNIA,

SCHEDULE Defendant. (ECF Nos. 77, 82, 83) Presently before the Court is Defendant Regents of the University of California’s Motions in Limine Nos. 2 and 3. ECF No. 82, 83. Numerous exhibits to the Motions contain Plaintiff’s full name despite Plaintiff’s intention to proceed anonymously in this litigation. See ECF No. 76. Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed Anonymously currently remains pending, and while the Court takes the time to resolve the Motion, it sua sponte STRIKES Defendant’s Motions in Limine Nos. 2 and 3 (ECF Nos. 82, 83) under its inherent authority to manage its docket. See Cahill v. Insider Inc., No. 24-2199, 2025 WL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.