(SS) Campos v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20251:21-cv-00827California968 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4 Sandy Marie Campos, CASE NO. 1:21-cv-00827-GSA 5 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY v. FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. 406(b) 7 (Doc. 27, 28, 29) 8 Commissioner of Social Security, 9 Defendant.

Plaintiff’s counsel—Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc.—seeks an award of attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). I. Background Plaintiff entered into a contingent fee agreement with counsel which provides for attorney fees of up to 25% of the past due benefits awarded. Doc. 27-1. The agreement also provides that counsel would seek fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), fees which would be refunded in the event of an award of past due benefits and payment of the 25% contingency fee. Id. Plaintiff filed a complaint in this Court on May 21, 2021, appealing the Commissioner’s decision denying her application for benefits. Plaintiff filed his motion for summary judgment (“opening brief”) on April 29, 2022. Doc. 19. Defendant responded on June 13, 2022. Doc. 21. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.