(HC) Clark v. Warden, FCI Mendota

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20251:24-cv-00211California1,350 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUSSEL BRUCE CLARK, No. 1:24-cv-00211-KES-SAB (HC) Petitioner,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

WARDEN, FCI MENDOTA, CORPUS IN PART

Respondent. (Doc. 17) 16 Petitioner Russel Bruce Clark is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Petitioner raises the following claims for relief: (1) prison officials failed to provide petitioner with the Discipline Hearing Officer (“DHO”) report within the time frames set forth in the Bureau of Prisons Program Statement 5270.09, Chapter 5, 541.8; (2) the Western Regional Office failed to enter petitioner’s BP–10 into SENTRY the day it was received; (3) the Western Regional Office violated due process under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.