Doerer

(HC) Rivera v. Doerer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20251:24-cv-01577California389 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FELIX A. RIVERA, JR., Case No. 1:24-cv-01577-JLT-HBK (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. (Doc. No. 10) DOERER, Respondent. 16 17 Before the court is Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel. (Doc. No. 10). Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has pending a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1). Petitioner requests that the Court to appoint counsel to represent him in this matter. (Doc. No. 10). There is no automatic, constitutional right to counsel in federal habeas proceedings. See Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 752 (1991); Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958). The Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, however, authorizes this court to appoint counsel for a financially eligible person who seeks relief under § 2241 when the “court determines that the interests of justice so require.” Id. at § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.