Rama

Williams v. Rama

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20251:25-cv-00232California1,718 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 AHKEEM WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:25-cv-00232-KES-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT AND GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED v. COMPLAINT 14 RASAEI RAMA, et al., (ECF No. 1) 15 Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 On February 21, 2025, Plaintiff Ahkeem Williams, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint against Rasaei Rama and Kaweah Health Mental Health. (ECF No. 1.) Following administrative filings not relevant here, on March 7, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and but stated that “service of the complaint shall not be undertaken until the Court screens the complaint in due course and issues its screening order.” (ECF No. 7.) The Court now undertakes screening of the complaint. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The in forma pauperis statute provides that a court shall dismiss a case if, inter alia, the 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.