(PS) Gifford v. Hornbrook Fire Protection District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20252:16-cv-00596California7,669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGER GIFFORD, No. 2:16-CV-0596-DJC-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER HORNBROOK FIRE PROTECTION and DISTRICT, et al., AMENDED FINDINGS AND Defendants. RECOMMENDATIONS 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding in forma pauperis and pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss. See ECF No. 66. Plaintiff has filed an opposition. See ECF No. 71. Defendants have filed a reply. See ECF No. 72. In response to the Court’s findings and recommendations, Plaintiff filed objections. See ECF Nos. 74 and 77. In light of Plaintiff’s objections, the Court will vacate the March 29, 2024, findings and recommendations and issue these amended findings and recommendations addressing the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s complaint in this civil case. In considering a motion to dismiss, the Court must accept all allegations of material fact in the complaint as true. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.