(HC) Sinclair v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20252:24-cv-00038California391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDER SINCLAIR, No. 2:24-cv-00038-EFB (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

LINDA CLARK, et al., Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner, a county jail prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 26, 2024, the court ordered petitioner to pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. ECF No. 4. The court further dismissed the petition as violating Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 2(c) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts with leave to amend within 30 days. Id. Plaintiff has not paid the fee, filed an in forma pauperis application, or filed an amended petition, and the time for doing so has passed. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a district judge to this action. It is further RECOMMENDED that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.