Cuevo

(PC) Allen v. Cuevo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20252:24-cv-02989California359 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY LEE ALLEN, JR., No. 2:24-cv-02989-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DANEILE CUEVO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On January 23, 2025, the court found that plaintiff was not qualified to proceed in forma pauperis in this action due to having “three strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). ECF No. 18. The court ordered plaintiff to pay the filing fee within 21 days. Plaintiff has not paid the fee or otherwise responded to the order. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a district judge to this action. It is further RECOMMENDED that the case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. //// //// ] These findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.