Lau

Lau v. Lau CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 6, 2013B241939California2,041 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/6/13 Lau v. Lau CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

DAIVD LAU, B241939

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC435921) v.

DORA LAU,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Elizabeth Allen White, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Larry Fabrizi, Larry Fabrizi for Defendant and Appellant.

Wong & Mak, Steven W. Hashimoto for Plaintiff and Respondent.

___________________________________________________ Appellant contends that the trial court erred by ordering partition of a property. She argues that the court should have found that the right to partition was waived. Because substantial evidence supported…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.