Singh

United States v. Singh

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202524-1281California851 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1281 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:13-cr-00118-LRH-WGC-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

SURJIT SINGH, AKA Sonny,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 6, 2025** Las Vegas, Nevada

Before: RAWLINSON, MILLER, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Surjit Singh (Singh) appeals the district court’s denial of his second petition

for a writ of error coram nobis. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and,

reviewing de novo, we affirm the district court’s denial of Singh’s second coram

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). nobis petition. See United States v. Kroytor, 977 F.3d 957, 961 (9th Cir. 2020).

“Coram nobis is an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.