Singh
Singh v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202523-4126California1,408 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PARMINDER SINGH; KULVIR No. 23-4126 KAUR; FATEHVIR SINGH; BIR KAUR, Agency Nos.
A241-911-201
Petitioners, A241-911-202
A241-911-203
v.
A241-911-204
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 6, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges. Partial Dissent by Judge LEE.
Parminder Singh, his spouse, and his two minor children (“Petitioners”),
natives and citizens of India, petition for review of a decision of the Board of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from the order of an
Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying their applications…