Singh

Singh v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202523-4126California1,408 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PARMINDER SINGH; KULVIR No. 23-4126 KAUR; FATEHVIR SINGH; BIR KAUR, Agency Nos.

A241-911-201

Petitioners, A241-911-202

A241-911-203

v.

A241-911-204

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 6, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges. Partial Dissent by Judge LEE.

Parminder Singh, his spouse, and his two minor children (“Petitioners”),

natives and citizens of India, petition for review of a decision of the Board of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from the order of an

Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying their applications…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.