Bondi

Ramos Merino v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202524-1134California1,042 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAUL PABLO RAMOS No. 24-1134 MERINO; GRACIEL A RAMOS- Agency Nos.

PUEL; DAPHNE F RAMOS- A241-845-454

PUEL; OLGUITO NOEMI PUEL- A241-845-456

ROSILLO; DYLAN GAEL RAMOS-

A241-845-457

PUEL,

A241-845-455

A241-845-458

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 26, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, GOULD, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Saul Pablo Ramos-Merino and his wife Olguita Noemi Puel-

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Rosillo and their three minor children, natives and citizens of Peru, petition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.