Cerda-Castillo

Cerda-Castillo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202524-431California1,265 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-431

OSMARA ELIZABETH CERDA-

CASTILLO; OSMAR ADOLFO

Agency Nos. A220-584-148

POTOSME-CERDA,

A220-584-149

Petitioners,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 25, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: NGUYEN and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges, and KERNODLE, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jeremy D. Kernodle, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas, sitting by designation. 1 Petitioner Osmara Cerda-Castillo is a citizen of Nicaragua. She petitions on

behalf of herself and her child for review of a decision by the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order

denying asylum,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.