In re D.G. CA5

facts of the underlying offense and the previous probation violation and we limit our factual summary to the facts giving rise to the second probation violation. (See People v. Glaser (1965) 238 Cal.App.2d 819, 821, disapproved on other grounds in People v. Barnum (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1210, 1218–1219, 1225 [“Although an appeal may lie from a subsequent order, which revokes probation and places the sentence into effect, the matters arising prior to pronouncement of judgment cannot thereby be reviewed”].) Our factual summary is taken from the report of the probation officer filed November 14.

3

DISCUSSION

Following independent review of the record, we have concluded that no reasonably arguable legal or factual issues exist.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

4