Stebbins

United States v. Stebbins

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 28, 202524-2958California934 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 28 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2958 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:20-cr-00049-BMM-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL STEBBINS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian M. Morris, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 26, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, GOULD, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Christopher Michael Stebbins appeals from the district court’s denial of his

motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 821

to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo both the district court’s “interpretation and application

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of the Sentencing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.